Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tori Kelly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus.

Tori Kelly

Delete nn child artist, could be notable enough for inclusion when album is released, but not at this moment. A Google search comes up with 4 results for "Victoria Tori Kelly", and less than 650 for "Tori Kelly", of which many appeared to be from various forums. Bjelleklang - talk 00:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- decent amount of television exposure. -- MusicMaker5376 00:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep, fair amount of coverage and appears to have been signed to a major label. Maybe look at again later to see if anything developed. Good nomination, though. Kuru ^talk 01:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I don't think it's a good idea to keep articles based on the possibility of future notability, but if we're pretty sure she's about to come out with an album on a major label, then I think it makes more sense to keep the article than to delete and recreate later. I won't vote keep, though, because I don't think there's a policy supporting my opinion on this. --Allen 01:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment A lot of people get signed by record labels without ever actually getting an album released. Until somebody at Geffen formally announces a release date, the album should be considered crystal ballish. Fan1967 01:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete If there was more info about the album I'd be inclined to a wait in see attitude, but winning a minor television show and being on or two others isn't notable. JoshuaZ 02:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It wasn't a hit show, but it was a nationally broadcast show. So, it really fits in the middle, and shouldn't be called minor. It's not like she just won a local talent contest. --Rob 09:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, barely asserts notability. --
  e Ong 04:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. --
  MaNeMeBasat 05:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep has had sufficient success to be deemed notable. --Rob 08:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per norm. Non notable, as has been said. If she releases some albums, gains a following, and actually sticks around for a while, that is a different story. Wikipedia cannot be allowed to become a forum for bios of every minor musician on the planet---press agents would love that! --Charles 17:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete per nom. We can afford to wait until she has released an album. Kimchi.sg | talk 18:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Has achieved sufficient success to be barely notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 19:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Siva1979 --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.