Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Dhamaal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A redirect can be done independently of this debate. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Total Dhamaal

Total Dhamaal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cites no sources, scant content. No evidence of notability. Lineslarge (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete:
  run of the mill. DrStrauss talk 15:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment:Would have voted delete were it not for my fear of @
  WP:NFF as principal photography has not yet begun. Jupitus Smart 15:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@

something else NOT a flat deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect: An article NEVER has to say "this topic is notable", as that unspoken statement is to be inferred from
  the production are getting coverage in a more than "trivial" manner. IE: Times of India (1), Hindustan Times (1), First Post, and NDTV, Financial Times Times of India (2), Hindustan Times (2), Bollywood News, and many more

That clarified, the issue is that it has not yet begin filming, but Hindustani Times(3) does imply that it will start later this year. So for now, as per suggested by

returned and improved after filming is confirmed and, if anyone wishes a nowiki'd copy to work on while we wait, I'd say let him do so. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Has
  significant coverage
  :

• "Total Dhamaal to star Ajay Devgn: Director Indra Kumar confirms Shivaay star's on board". First Post. 5 June 2017.
• Iyeri, Meena (5 June 2017). "Ajay Devgn to play the lead in 'Total Dhamaal'". The Times of India.
• Goyal, Samarth (3 June 2017). "Sanjay Dutt pulls out of Total Dhamaal; doesn't want his kids to see him in adult comedies". Hindustan Times.
• "Sanjay Dutt quits film Total Dhamal due to its 'adult comedy'". The Indian Express.

• The article can be expanded quite easily. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 21:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Having further read what Schmidt wrote, I think his redirect option is in order. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 21:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Has significant coverage by Times of India (1) and many others, passes
  WP:NTEMP says once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. This article topic has lot of significant coverage mostly by reliable Indian news media. Anoptimistix (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete Fails
  WP:GNG.-Umair Aj (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• @
  WP:ATD we have alternatives. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.