Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tova Levy-Furman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tova Levy-Furman

Tova Levy-Furman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Useful links:

- since articles about diplomats are hard to classify under guidelines, this essay talks about what a diplomat's article may have to include to be notable. Note that this is NOT a guideline, just a suggestion but I've used the points raised that suggest notability below to show how she doesn't meet the criteria.

Google search for Tova Levy-Furman's name

As per

, no significant coverage at all for Levy-Furman, except for citation 2. All other references on Google are of Levy-Furman being included in lists of diplomats, which do not represent significant coverage. Additionally, there are not even a significant number of lists she is included in, to further enhance the case for non-notability. As per , not received an award or part of an important contribution.

As per

, not a head of mission (looking at citation 1, page 19). Also did not receive coverage for crafting a treaty or being involved in a notable diplomatic event.

She is also a now-retired diplomat according to citation 2, and involvement with the activist organisations doesn't confer notability.

Hunter 22:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete ambassadors are not default notable and the coverage is not enough to justify an article. I suspect we have many articles on ambassadors that are not justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. I note that I disagreed at the time with the
  change in consensus, but since have gone along. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - per rationale already stated above - GizzyCatBella🍁 02:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.