Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toxic Baby
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toxic Baby
- Toxic Baby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article lacks neutrality and appears to be an essay written with the aim of blaming "chemicals" for rising instances of diseases. It also promotes a film. The links provided are only tangentally related to the article as they discuss the perceived phenomenon and not the film. This should be deleted because it's not encyclopedic. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete The article comes across as highly unencyclopedic to me, since it doesn't begin by introducing what "Toxic Baby" is. And I agree with all the criticisms of the nominee. The subject matter, issues of chemicals and their effects on babies and the like, belongs on other wikipedia pages--and needs to be introduced with careful thought, integrated into other topics, and by appealing to reliable sources. Cazort (talk) 14:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a poorly written article about a new documentary film, which has an IMDB entry and a few cursory mentions elsewhere on the web, but nothing that comes close to establishing notability. Looie496 (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The text is copied from [1] , but I'm not sure if it's a sufficiently close copy to merit a G12. No assertion of notability and no sources, in any case. Tevildo (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above and nom. Agree with Cazort. Meph Yazata (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.