Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train of Thought Sketch Comedy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Train of Thought Sketch Comedy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local sketch comedy group from 2006; requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News. No higher notability established since last AFD ended with no consensus eight years ago. --

Wikipedical (talk) 08:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar

♔ 21:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Any of the coverage mentioned in the article seems to be strictly local, contrary to
talk) 18:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.