Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trap17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Neutrality^talk 15:22, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trap17

Ad for a free webhost. --fvw* 00:10, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: It's nothing but an advertisement — Cory Maylett 02:13, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn. Webhosts are a dollar a dozen. — Phil Welch 02:38, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Cory Maylett --Icarus 05:15, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Friedo 07:12, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nice idea, but still an ad. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:00, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Alexa is 45,465, which seems low for a web host. Flowerparty■ 11:38, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• This entry has been Transwikied to Yellowikis by User:Uncle_G's bot --Payo 12:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is Yellowikis, and how can we "transwiki" to a site that is not a sister project? User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:32, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is what a Google search turned up: [1]. They use the same skin as us, anyway, but I've never heard of them. A Meta search for Yellowiki turns up zilch, so I doubt they're a sister project. --
      talk 00:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
      ]
    • See
      AfD discussion). In the very same way that we transwiki to that subset of the sibling projects to which transwikification is permitted. The procedure is identical. Uncle G 01:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • I strongly protest the use of the term transwiki to describe moving GFDL articles to non-Wikipieda projects. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:53, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        • Then you are on your own, and in disagreement with many other editors, since excluding all projects except for Wikipedia ones is not its generally accepted meaning. Excluding all projects except for Wikimedia ones is not its generally accepted meaning, even. I suggest that you read the first sentence of m:transwiki to see how broadly encompassing the concept is, in Angela's own words. I also suggest that if you are going to propose changing the terminology to your newly-coined highly restricted meaning, you do so not here but on the talk page at Meta. Uncle G 01:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
          • You're biting a bit hard, mate. A simple, "That's not the generally accepted definition of tranwiki, see
            talk 04:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
            ]
          • Ohhhhhhhh. Now I get it. If I want an article deleted from Wikipedia, all I have to do is "transwiki" it to some obscure GFDL wiki and delete it, huh? User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
            • Again, you will find yourself in disagreement with many other editors in that understanding. Please read the existing extensive discussions of this, beginning with the very talk page that I mentioned above and proceeding to
              Wikipedia talk:Votes for deletion/Archives, and Template talk:Move to Wiktionary. Uncle G 18:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
              ]
• Delete per all. --
  talk 19:35, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I don't get it... how does this differ from Geocities and Freewebs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dooga (talk • contribs) 2005-09-20 03:37:48 UTC
  • Freewebs has been the subject of independent news stories, too. This is not the case for Trap17. Uncle G 10:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Delete Josh Parris # 02:34, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.