Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trent Lockett
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Trent Lockett
- Trent Lockett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:NBASKETBALL Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Delete. This player certainly doesn't meetWP:BASKETBALL. Playing in the NBA D-LEagues does not establish notability. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Change to keep. Even though not all basketball players are notable, but clearly this guy has to be notable. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)]- Keep Second Team All-PAC 12 selection. The article was poorly written in the beginning but is better now. Passes GNG since it has multiple non-trivial references. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple independent sources.—Bagumba (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)]
- Keep As stated, meets GNG due to independent non-routine coverage such as this and this and this. Rikster2 (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.