Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tretter Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability seems to be established, though reliable sources should be added to the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tretter Collection

Tretter Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

• Keep I wouldn't say it's failing a google test- Google finds quite a few mentions of it. It needs sourced, however. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the

^Sing 21:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep - Google in fact does return relevant hits that can be used to source this article.
  ^Sing 22:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.