Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Thomas (marketer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Thomas (marketer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable marketer. Forbes 30 under 30 is effectively meaningless at this point and I see no real coverage of Thomas. Praxidicae (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meet the criteria for Notability (people) of "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times", specifically with both Forbes 30 Under 30 which meets notability criteria and the Campaign Power 100. Your opinion of whether the Forbes award is a good award doesn't seem to be relevant. Additionally, potential to meet criteria for Creative Professionals of "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." Rangysane123 (talk)

you can say what you want but there’s nothing to verify your last statement. If I’m wrong, provide those sources. Praxidicae (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear fail of
^{• whaddya want? •} 19:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails
WP:GNG and over 1,000 are named 30 under 30 every year so thats not particularly significant. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete in-depth significant coverage in
reliable sources of subject of discussion is non existent. I’m also voicing Praxidicae‘s rationale about Forbes U30. Celestina007 (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:UPANDCOMING; being listed in one story does not make one automatically notable. The subject hasn't done anything notable, nor does one article constitute significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as not passing
WP:GNG. Non-notable marketer. Lightburst (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete a list like "30 under 30" is basically an informed but still crystal ball guess that the person will be notable down the line, it is clearly not on its own a sign the person is notable today.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I will add by bit. Very poor sourcing and almost no detectable coverage. Fails
WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 14:11, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I can't really see how this person meets
WP:GNG. He would better belong in another wiki elsewhere. Ambrosiawater (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.