Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrumpiLeaks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TrumpiLeaks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:G5 (article author is blocked sock of editor topic banned from editing articles containing political or religious biographical information, in this case Trump) as there are no other contributions, except technical fixes. wumbolo ^^^ 15:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment There's over a year of many editors in the history. Widefox; talk 15:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:06, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'd say
WP:SYNTHESIS. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete based on a nearly dead website. It never took off. From the initial flurry of very limited attention, it fizzled out. There was no "there" there. --
talk) PingMe 02:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.