Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsonka ball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus below, no arguments for retention. Hiding T 16:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tsonka ball

Tsonka ball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Unreferenced neologism with a sketchy and unhelpful definition. Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Blatantly obvious "thing made up one day", bordering on
  WP:CSD#G1 (WP:Patent nonsense). -Verdatum (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Delete Just nonsense. And made up one day. DarkAudit (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per
  talk) 00:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Very strong delete.
  Wikipedia is not for things made up at/after school one day. —C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete I guess it was supposed to be funny. Probably a practical joke directed at someone whose last name is Tsonka. Not cool. Mandsford (talk) 15:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This looks like it fits deletion criteria per
  WP:MADEUP. – jaksmata 19:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per reasoning in my PROD.
  z 02:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.