Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbo Touch 360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo Touch 360

Turbo Touch 360 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested with "remove deletionism". This appears to be a third-party video game controller with little to no assertion of notability, and fails the

• Keep A news search turned up hits in The Herald Journal, USA Today, The Washington Post and The Huffington Post. Since the product was manufacturered for a variety of video game consoles, a redirect would be inappropriate as there's no obvious choice. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep And the nominator should please remember to click the Google news or the video game wikiproject custom search for something BEFORE trying to delete something. Dream Focus 19:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Having clicked the links, I'm still not seeing much to assert notability here. Just because the controller is mentioned in a couple of newspapers doesn't give it instant notability (
  WP:NOTNEWS). The reviews of the controller, i.e. the IGN one in the article and The Huffington Post link might, however, if something insightful can be said in the article using them that makes this controller worthy of note, more than a simple ordinal ranking. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 15:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• And if such can be written, I'd be glad to withdraw this AFD. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 15:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Notable product. Please consult
  WP:BEFORE before nominating articles for deletion.--MoonMetropolis (talk) 06:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.