Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turbo cooking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo cooking

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a

WP:NEOLOGISM, the use of which isn't supported by any of the links provided. I can't find any real evidence that this is a commonly accepted name for any type of cooking Dexxtrall (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pure OR essay. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rogermx (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Well it seems that I do Turbo Cooking all the time, but didn't know it was called that. However, a Google search does not bring up to much about this technique. They are all about a "Turbo Cooker." Lesliechin1 (talk) 22:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Useful and informative content, but abjectly fails
WP:GNG and exists as original research validated by synthesis. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.