Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Ramsey (artist) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Ramsey (artist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability guidelines Robrobbie2 (talk) 22:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced. Doesn't meet notability requirements https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability. Most links don't refer to his art. No references to curated shows or work. No sources for art since 2013. The only major editor is a single user who has only posted edits on this one page - likely the artist himself.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article has already been ~~deleted~~ nominated for deletion three times, and the subject still does not meet notability criteria for WP:NARTIST, nor WP:GNG. The references/sources are mentions (a couple sentences), or dead links or don't mention him at all. The ones with more than two or three sentences are human interest pieces, like how he met his fiancé. None are significant coverage, nor reviews/articles of critical and/or art historical importance. Lastly I'm wondering why the article states who he is "friends" with - notability is not inherited from friends or family. Netherzone (talk) 02:10, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NARTIST fail. Almost all of the creative work is done in service of a brand. They amount to publicity stunts.
talk) 10:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.