Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Type 003 aircraft carrier
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2018 July 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Chinese aircraft carrier programme. Sandstein 09:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Type 003 aircraft carrier
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Merge to Chinese aircraft carrier programme: Besides the first one, all other references only have very brief mentions of Type 003. The article as it is does not have enough content to be an individual article. Mys_721tx (talk) 03:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nautical-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Merge. This is borderline (vs. a keep) - as it seems the program has been possibly launched, but construction will be only completed in the late 2020s. Many of the details in the current article seem wrong (or at least not in sync what I've read presently - which may vary from other sources given the BALLish nature of future development). Some sources with some coverage - [1][2][3]. This probably should've gone to a merge discussion and not AfD.Icewhiz (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.