Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 71

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -

UFC 71

UFC 71 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Subject is a rumored event that has not been reliably reported on yet. All information about this event that is known and confirmed is generic, it does not deserve (yet) an article per

• Delete as crystal-balling and an unsourced article. On a side note, the removal of prods doesn't require a reason -- the text says that "if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason" you can remove it. Dylan 06:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete UFC 70 hasn't even been confirmed, yet alone 71. Also, it's usually just anon IP's that remove a PROD for no reason, I think a reason should be given in order for it to be removed (otherwise it can be put back up). TJ Spyke 08:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced "crystal ball" article with nothing except generic information and rumors. Thesaddestday 16:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and everything else said above. Lewis 21:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Although this event will almost certainly occur, these kind of events should not have pages created for them until a reliable source confirms them. We can recreate the article when that happens. VegaDark 07:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.