Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Mondamin (1864)

USS Mondamin (1864) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wasn't finished, doesn't even have an entry in DANFS. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This AFD is directly related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Tahgayuta (1863), about another ship in the class, an AFD opened same day by same editor. --doncram 14:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge all the cancelled cancelled ships at Template:Contoocook class sloop/frigate to a new article on the class, since some ships of the class were in fact buit. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 20:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge I agree.TH1980 (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Why we would maintain an article on a cancelled Civil War ship project. There are six of these. This gets far down into a level of minutiae that doesn't seem significant. --Lockley (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the target that doncram has set up. --Lockley (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- the pages for the cancelled ship projects are generally deleted, per my understanding. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC) [reply]

• Merge and redirect: the cancelled ships of the class should probably just redirect to an article on the class, which could include a brief paragraph on the topic. That said, it doesn't appear to exist, yet, unfortunately. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge. I set up
  Contoocook class sloop/frigate as a section in the USS Contoocook (1864) article to serve as a merge target. --doncram 17:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to list article. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to USS_Contoocook_(1864)#Contoocook_class_sloop.2Ffrigate; anything useful can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the class page - this is standard practice unless the cancelled ship is otherwise notable (see for instance Japanese battleship Tosa), which is not the case here. Parsecboy (talk) 09:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the proposed article/class section. Named warships are almost always notable, but only if they are actually built. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.