Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubidays
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to talk) 02:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ubidays
- Ubidays (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article violates
E3, Gamescom and the Tokyo Game Show
. Several reliable online have confirmed this news which was revealed on April 9, 2009:
1. No more Ubidays for Ubisoft - Big Download.com
2. Ubisoft scraps UbiDays 2009 event - Eurogamer
3. No Ubidays for 2009 - Exophase.com
4. No Ubidays event this year -
GamesIndustry.biz
5. Imagine: A year without Ubidays - Joystiq
6. No Ubidays for 2009 - M for Mature.com
Market for Home Computing and Video Games (MCV)
8. No Ubidays In 2009 - Portalit.net JuventusGamer (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ubisoft. Wknight94 talk 12:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Agree with Wknight. If it doesn't happen anymore, no need to have an article about it. Angryapathy (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the ]
- Keep'. Once notable, always notable. All the coverage in the references cited above makes me think the topic must be notable. "If it doesn't happen anymore" is never a valid reason to delete an article. - Eastmain (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand using the additional sources provided by nom. Notability isn't temporary, and the event seems to have gained decent coverage. --Taelus (talk) 10:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - it's about a press conference, so maybe deserves a line in Ubisoft, but not its own article. JohnBlackburne (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ubisoft. Right now this article stands as more of an advert-esque entry, which could be cleaned up, but it would be better served in the parent article where it can have a paragraph or two that covers everything here. --Teancum (talk) 12:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ubisoft as per above. A fully referenced section in the Ubisoft article could save this information, as it is regarded as notable. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 15:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.