Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra-Lounge
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 00:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ultra-Lounge
- Ultra-Lounge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable comp —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article isn't about a 'comp', but a whole series of compilations. It's a notable and, it would seem, successful series: Billboard, Billboard, SPIN.--Michig (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in agreement with Michig. I will also point out that the nominator's unhelpful reasoning of "Non-notable comp" has appeared in a bunch of recent nominations and clearly violates WP:JNN. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per refs posted by Michig. Robman94 (talk) 16:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for same reason as above. --74.5.25.40 (talk) 01:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Non-notable my foot. This is a compilation series that has been very instrumental in introducing many people to the Lounge Music family of genres.Keyboard warrior killer (talk) 03:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I fail to see how this is a "non-notable compilation". This is a release series that has been active for 15 years, has included over 40 separate titles, and is released and maintained by a major label. You can find literally hundreds of reviews for these discs on Amazon.com. Really, what more do you need? This is far from being some sort of $3.99, no liner notes, no-frills, Wayne Newton compilation CD you find at a truck stop! Could we please drop this nomination and close the discussion? WillieBlues (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- I found this page while looking for information. Isn't that what an encyclopedia is for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.82.116 (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.