Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorn DAO (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nadya Tolokonnikova. Liz Read! Talk! 04:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn DAO

Unicorn DAO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the references are sufficient to meet

HighKing++ 12:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

It has 5 paragraphs about it in the Time article and 3 in the CNN piece, rest are gravy. Oaktree b (talk) 14:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a company/organization so
HighKing++ 16:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The brief CNN article is mostly based on "Organizers said", "UkraineDAO said", "According to UkraineDAO's website", "Pussy Riot's Nadya Tolokonnikova, who collaborated with NFT platform CXIP, digital art studio Trippy Labs and online collective PleasrDAO -- said", "said Tolokonnikova", and "On its website, UkraineDAO said". Per
WP:NOT policy. Beccaynr (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Also, the CNN article is about UkraineDAO, not UnicornDAO. Both are discussed in a Politico blurb about Pussy Riot and "UnicornDAO, co-founded by Pussy Riot’s Nadya Tolokonnikova", which notes "(Tolokonnikova has experience in crypto altruism, also having helped found UkraineDAO, which raised millions of dollars to support the country in its war against Russia.)" Beccaynr (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge relevant sources and content to
    WP:PROMO for UkraineDAO, not UnicornDAO. Beccaynr (talk) 19:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just to note as the nom I agree with Beccaynr above that a Merge to
    HighKing++ 16:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.