Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Flight 923
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
United Flight 923
Nothing much actually happened. Plane makes emergency landing because someone had a panic attack. Happens 2 or 3 times a month. -
Blood red sandman 16:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
- Merge with 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot or transwiki to Wikinews. Non-notable on its own, but somewhat relevant considering the incident's close incidence to the uncovering of the plot. Doesn't need its own article. - RPIRED 18:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable. FairHair 23:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is nothing inherently notable in United Flight 923. There are several of them every week. This article deals with a miniscule part of the flight's history etc., a false alarm which has received 'one coverage' as defined in wiki notability criteria in WP:BIO. I contend that it is not a signicant event in aviation or terrorism history or the history of the airline in that it would not have a significant impact on future events that suggests that it would pass a 5 year test, let alone a 100 year test. Ohconfucius 04:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As with Northwest Airlines Flight 42, this flight is not notable for United Airlines. Tinlinkin 05:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Security scare, but will soon be pretty much forgotten. Planes having to be diverted is a pretty common occurrence and usually not encyclopedically significant unless the plane was in some sort of peril (e.g. American Airlines Flight 63 is notable). Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we won't remember this in a week. --talk. ^_^ 06:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.