Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Converter (Unit Conversion Software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Converter (Unit Conversion Software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software with no indication of notability. A PROD tag was put on it shortly after creation in August last year; it was contested with the argument that "most of the references in the article are from notable sites, and the software is known to be reputable". Unfortunately, that a software programme is available for download from a notable website does not make the product notable, and there is no trace of any significant coverage in reliable independent sources. bonadea contributions talk 13:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you kindly direct me to information explaining what exactly constitutes 'significant' coverage and examples of 'reliable independence sources'? Ant2101 talk —Preceding undated comment added 17:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, of course - the relevant policies/guidelines are explained
this policy. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 17:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Soupy sautoy (talk) 15:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.