Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Syncopations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miroslav Vitouš. Redirecting as an editorial decision. Consider this a no consensus close with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Syncopations

Universal Syncopations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album; delete or merge to Vitous article Orange Mike | Talk 16:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Allmusic.com it is an "AMC Album Pick" if this one isn't notable then none of his albums are. Why delete information that could be of use to some poeple? Dan Hewins (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep or merge Polarpanda (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.