Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled seventh studio album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nousernamesleft (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled seventh studio album

Another "forthcoming album" article (we should have a speedy category for them). The source quoted is Billboard com: "Jack has said the duo has already started working on its seventh studio album." No track list, no release date, not even a name.

WP:MUSIC#Albums: "a future album whose article is titled "(Artist)'s Next Album" and consists solely of blog or fan forum speculation about possible titles, or songs that might be on the album, is a WP:CRYSTAL violation and should be discussed only in the artist's article." We don't even have title or song speculation. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.
WP:CRYSTAL,... Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Unsourced, and the title and content are unencyclopedic. I don't like these "upcoming album" pages, because they're borne from little more than people vying to be the first to post an article about it that usually consists of non-notable information.
^chitchat 21:11, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete While I like to save as many of those future album for deletion articles, in this case there is nothing about it at all. There is simply no content specific about this album and thus there is nothing to have an article about. So Why ^{review me!} 21:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom.--Esprit15d • wish me a happy wikiversary! • contribs 21:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as
WP:HAMMER as well - if there's no title available, 9 times out of 10 it's crystal balling. If this article is kept, it must be renamed something less generic, such as White Stripes seventh studio album or something. 23skidoo (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, it's not
WP:CRYSTAL exactly, there's no 'unverifiable speculation' - mostly because there's not much of anything at all. Nothing is known about this album to write an encyclopedia article on at the moment, I honestly can't see the point of having a page with no real content at all. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 22:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:CRYSTAL: title, track list and release date must all be confirmed by artist or label. Cliff smith ^talk 22:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Go the
Hammer. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk"

Delete a case of
reliable sources. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 01:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. We can have this back when we at least can offer the album's name. We can take the few kilobytes the deletion would save us and, I dunno, rent them out to pay for server costs or something. Maybe use them to host a .gif of an adorable breakdancing rodent. - Vianello (talk) 01:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I said it once before but it bears repeating. Delete JuJube (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete the
WP:SNOW has fallen. Egad. No. JBsupreme (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.