Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upasana Taku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Upasana Taku

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable; the company may or may not be, but she seems to be engaged in routine management functions. That she gave an interview about the company is not notability DGG ( talk ) 03:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable individual. Notability is not inherited from the company to it's founder. ChunnuBhai (talk) 05:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear advertising with the clear motivations that's why this only ever existed. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing more than routine, trivial coverage Spiderone 10:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not news. 208.79.11.74 (talk) 06:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.