Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urdusky (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A Traintalk 21:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Urdusky
AfDs for this article:
- Urdusky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable per
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. — TheMagnificentist 09:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)]
WP:VAGUEWAVE
; we need more extensive rationales to reach a consensusPlease add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- delete given that searches don't produce anyone talking about it in a page or so of results— just Facebook pages and other link-backs. Mangoe (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.