Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valasakkadu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure --Pgallert (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valasakkadu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The place exists. It's non notable. Found no news links or reliable sources for notability. Request deleting this article ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 13:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All villages are notable, but there may be more than one by this name, or some of the information listed in it may be incorrect. I can find a village by this name in Cuddalore district at http://wikimapia.org/9976683/Valasakkadu-K-M-Koil-TK-Cuddalore-Dist - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Places - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep verifiable village. –SpacemanSpiff 18:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is a population center, but as Eastmain point out, there might be more than one Valasakkadu which is something editors should be conscious of. --Oakshade (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- And that's at Valasakkadu, Cuddalore district. –SpacemanSpiff 21:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing AfD. As per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Places which Eastmain pointed out, villages are generally notable. Completely missed it. My apologies. Thanks ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 04:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.