Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vangelis Raptopoulos

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 12:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Vangelis Raptopoulos

Vangelis Raptopoulos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe that tis article should be removed from Wikipedia. There is a lack of notability and his presence appears to be quite non-encyclopaedic. Most of the links have been taken from his own blog, whilst his presence in media is extremely limited. A few comment sections on a number of online sources is also not enough for notability. The person who created this added several links to a bunch of online pages, such as IMDB(!) - this person is just a novelist. Finally there is another mention of a "professorship"(what a claim!) at the Hellenic Open University. After some googling I only found that he is a teaching assistant - definitely not a professor. Glucken123 (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Leaning Keep: A cursory review of English and French-language sources reveals some scholarly attention to his work:
  • Nigianni, Panagiota (2019-07-04). "The Politics of Subjectivity in Vangelis Raptopoulos's Urban Stories". The European Legacy. 24 (5): 537–552.
    ISSN 1084-8770
    .
  • Stamatiadou, Isavella (2016-01-03). "L'anthropophagie dans la littérature néo-hellénique: Représentations, pratiques, symbolismes". Cahiers balkaniques (in French) (Hors-série).
    ISSN 0290-7402
    .
  • Turner, Marcia (1997). "Review of The Cicadas'".
    ISSN 1077-2901
    .
I do not read Greek, but there appear to be additional sources in Greek at Raptopoulos' article in elwiki. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do read Greek. The Wiki Article is full of links to his blog. Glucken123 (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Scholarly attention does not necessarily mean notability. As you can see the number of views or citations is close to 0. Glucken123 (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment @AleatoryPonderings and Glucken123: Most part of the Greek article on Raptopoulos was copy pasted from his personal blog and an autobiographical note at the Greek National Book Centre data base, plus a promotional listing of "praise". The Greek article has now been cleaned up by myself (see [1]; cf. oldid=8339489 and oldid=8340124). ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 00:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS. @Glucken123: BTW He definitely isn't a faculty member of the Hellenic Open University [2]; he is only an adjunct teaching assistant [3]. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 01:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per AleatoryPonderings as his work has been reviewed in reliable sources. But remove most of the EXTLINKS from the page. pburka (talk) 19:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Removed ! ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: the coverage in reliable sources identified by AleatoryPonderings is sufficient to satisfy
    WP:BK #1. If there were issues of unencyclopaedic tone or exaggeration for promotional purposes these seem to have been surmounted. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.