Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victims of Mutilation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:45, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victims of Mutilation

Victims of Mutilation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This demo, limited to 500 copies, does not appear to meet

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete: This release, while limited, is important for archival purposes as it is the first ever release of professionally recorded material by the band and is therefore just as relevant as any other EP or Album put out by the band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagozzino (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, fails
  WP:NALBUMS with miles to spare. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and Merge: Same comment here as the one I made in this related discussion. There is a difference between "notable" and "of historical interest." Verifiable text of interest can be merged to band page. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, Wikipedia isn't a personal archive or fansite Alan - talk 23:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.