Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Drazen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This looks like a good candidate for a merge but that's matter for editorical discretion. There is no clear consensus to delete this as it stands and the sourcing there is is not addressed in the discussion

Victor Drazen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

No assert of notability. Tagged for Notability since September 2007! It consists mainly of plot. A fictional character who appeared in only in 1 of the 7 seasons (so far) of a TV show. No reason to convert to a redirect a minor character like that. Magioladitis (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the
  list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Magioladitis (talk) 16:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Merge to an article such as

Recurring and minor characters in 24. Along with all the other characters. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line} 16:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep - and improve. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How? Can you find any references proving that this character is notable, not only in the series'context? -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to characters list; non-notable, contains only plot re-hashing. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keepas a major character in he series, assumin gthe series is important enough. If the series is of borderline importance, then merge--a question for the talk page, not here. DGG (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as notable. No reason to delete. --63.3.1.2 (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• merge per Mr. Absurd... some very minor info is verified but really not enough to support its own article... 99.251.171.248 (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I closed this as "keep" but another editor felt that my close was incorrect and reopened it so I feel the best thing to do is relist. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I don't see any evidence that this fictional character has received significant coverage in
  WP:RS. All I see is a regurgitation of in-universe plot details. VG ☎ 14:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.