Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/View Ridge, Seattle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles (talk) 02:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

View Ridge, Seattle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion or evidence of

notability of this suburban Seattle neighborhood; has remained wholly unsourced since creation. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C17:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep I expanded the article to include the neighborhood's history and several references. The neighborhood appears to be a distinct neighborhood of Seattle with a significant history, and it was profiled in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer several years ago. Since most significant neighborhoods of large cities are considered notable, this should be notable based on the references provided. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 21:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on Cat's good work. The points in its favor is that its boundaries are defined by the City Clerk's office, and it's one of about 100 such neighborhoods in a city of 600,000. Mandsford 21:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. Nice rescue job, Catalyst. --MelanieN (talk) 01:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.