Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinnie Vineyard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:59, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vinnie Vineyard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected

csp

|username}}.

This article is essentially a repost of an AfD deleted article (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinnie vineyard) with the addition of a current run for Govenor which also does not infer notability. The reason for the earlier AfD still holds. The Db-repost tag was deleted and reinstated a couple of times.

Paraphrased from the original AfD OK, so there are multiple possible claims to notability, but I found none of them hold the water. A third-party unsuccessful political candidate to a state parliament is hardly worth mentioning; same for a DJ at local radio stations. The wrestling career falls short of

WP:WRESTLING. PRehse (talk) 12:29, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being a non-winning fringe party candidate in a gubernatorial election is not an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL, and nothing else here represents a notability or sourceability improvement over the prior version. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NPOL. The other aspects of his professional career don't appear notable either in their fields. Teemu08 (talk) 03:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NPOL. SportingFlyer talk 18:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NPOL. A non0notable candidate with a varied but non-notable pre-candidacy career.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Unelected politician. Carrite (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.