Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viola Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 17:13, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Viola Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

t@lk to M£ 08:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - no references, no evidence of notability, weasel words ("firebrand economist"?!), self promotion etc.. Chandler321 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

t@lk to M£ 09:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

t@lk to M£ 09:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

t@lk to M£ 09:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - Simply no obvious signs of better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 04:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.