Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voylla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voylla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nominating because nothing is improved in last 6 month. conflict of interest to highly promotional. Article is mere reflection of press coverage and used for advertising only. Light2021 (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --
WP:WEBHOST to house companies' promotional messages. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as
promotional text unsuitable for an online encyclopaedia. Quis separabit? 02:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.