Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCF Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete.

TimothyJosephWood 23:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

WCF Wrestling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 10:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 10:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as in fact A7 and WP:NOT also applies since this only exists as a listing, enough said. SwisterTwister talk 03:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found...literally nothing besides social media. Exactly zero news coverage. Agree that it is eligible under no credible claim. I have nominated for A7.
TimothyJosephWood 18:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.