Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUPT-CA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WUPT-CA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources; notable only on local level. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Michigan. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can't get to the sources and databases I'd want to see right now to check this, but being affiliated with UPN and a Class A make me really hesitant to say this won't meet GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Station meets
chatter) 19:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Hemanth Nalluri 11 (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.