Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Afterburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

sh! 02:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

WWE Afterburn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A highlights show, not notable in its' own right. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 16:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Aired for three seasons in syndication,
chatter) 17:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.LM2000 (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Keep Meets GNG,
WP:TVSERIES.LM2000 (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.