Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE in 2005

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WWE in 2005

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't seem to be any other "WWE in [year]" articles and it doesn't seem like something that's entirely needed. Looks more like something belonging on WWE Wikia.

Gloss • talk 16:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is nothing here that is either not already covered or could easily be covered if necessary. We already have an article for the drafts and even if the PPV attendance figures were sourced they would be better served at the articles for the events. There is nothing here that we need.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete like there's no tomorrow. Pointless article, and I just had to remove some user's own personal opinions on why it was such a good year. —
BB 23:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete There's an ongoing debate about whether or not articles like this, which detail a year in wrestling, should exist. While something like this might exist one day, this one is beyond salvation. Best to
WP:TNT it and start anew if we get to that point.LM2000 (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.