Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WYAM-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WYAM-LD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG; no sources; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This might pass the GNG. I've at least shorn it of all the advertising crud. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I would say stations are a special circumstances of Rabbitears being good enough to showcase notability. Sure, 90 something percent of people in the US have never heard of WYAM, but the same exact thing can be said of all stations where (with the exception of large markets like Chicago) the only content would invariably be the the infobox, station history, list of staff, etc. Wikipedia's coverage of stations overall is moreso a database so if this got deleted, most station articles might as well be deleted too.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 13:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.