Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wally Garard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Thanks for your contributions and assuming good faith with this decision. If you have a problem with it, please bring up your concerns at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thank you and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wally Garard

Wally Garard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 00:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 00:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the
  talk) 00:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep, I believe he meets GNG with the coverage in the article from The San Francisco Examiner, the Concord Transcript, and the Oakland Tribune. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets GNG per BeanieFan. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 14:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per
  WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 15:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per BeanieFan and
  1939 NFL Draft -- showing the high regard in which he was held as one of the top competitors in the sport at that time. The fact that he chose not to play professional football should not be held against him -- the NFL was not then what it is now, and many elite players opted not to play at the pro level. Cbl62 (talk) 19:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:51, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per GNG. Rlendog (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets
  WP:BASIC, per all above. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep It's rare to see an article with such detail and thorough coverage. This is a clear pass of
  WP:GNG regardless of failure of any other notability guideline.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.