Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War Brokers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
War Brokers
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- War Brokers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Provided references do not prove notability. No sign of reliable sources after a quick search, only a few listicles.
(talk) 17:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Game has zero reviews on Metacritic, which generally indicates that reliable secondary sourcing even within the video game press space aren't taking note. For that matter, there is only a single user review. WP:VG/S reliable source search produces zero results. The only two secondary sources in use are listicles without real in-depth coverage. While PC Gamer is reliable, I'm not sure about MakeUseOf, but these are still just short blurbs in a listicle. -- ferret (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete I also did an extensive search but found no more sources than what's mentioned in the article. Timur9008 (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Lack of independent and reliable references. Sources of article are not solid enough to demonstrate notability. talk) 22:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete I don't have anything new to say. Sultan the Sultan (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.