Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Came To Take Your Jobs Away

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to Kultur Shock. While I have closed Kultur Shock's own AfD as keep, I do not believe that these articles stand alone, as none of them contain any content other than a tracklist and a non-free cover image. No prejudice against converting them back into stand-alone articles in the unlikely event that some reliably sourced content can be added. --Stormie (talk) 09:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We Came To Take Your Jobs Away

)

Delete nn apparently self-released album from band that is either nn or just barely so (to be determined below), and three more also:

I am also nominating:

Kultura Diktatura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
)

Fucc The I.N.S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
)

Live In Amerika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views
)

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per argument below. Rigadoun (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I mean, per the argument in
  WP:MUSIC. Rigadoun (talk) 01:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All of these are not notable. The band is not notable and certainly their albums are not. Also, even if the band were notable, it does not necessarily mean the albums are, it just means that they are much more likely to be. There are still plenty of exceptions. Aside from notability guidelines, there is not enough verifiable material on these albums to justify a well-written article about any of them.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 16:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Oni Ookami Alfador.
boy00 @791, i.e. 17:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. No secondary or independent sources. No reviews at Amazon. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.