Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Fonarow
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wendy Fonarow
- Wendy Fonarow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She is a published author and writes a column in The Guardian, but coverage of the author herself seems pretty sparse. Does not seem to be a particularly
talk) 20:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
- Weak keep. It seems like having a regular column in a major newspaper is enough to establish notability, though I have to admit I can't find anything in our policies to back that up.—Chowbok ☠ 22:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Keep. she has a book from a major university press, which was reviewed in the NYTimes [1], which makes a good case for notability. Lots of GScholar hits, too, indicating a level of prominence in her field. Together there seems to be enough to satisfy the GNG even if the SNGs might be borderline cases. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.