Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Yosemite League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
West Yosemite League
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- West Yosemite League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This league lacks the
WP:SIGCOV needed for a standalone article. No issues here for redirecting this to CIF Central Section. Let'srun (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and California. Let'srun (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Less than a month and a half ago, this NOM was involved in a WP:BEFORE. That means look first. If the article is missing some significant coverage, use your editing skills to FIX IT before bothering the entire community to needlessly discuss deleting an article.Trackinfo (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)]
- ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. There appears to be extensive coverage of this league in local media - Newspapers.com brings up 25,000 matches for "West Yosemite League" and its games regularly receive significant coverage. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- ]
- As far as I'm aware, being extensively covered on a regular basis is what makes for a notable league; that's why WP:NBASIC states]
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)- "inclusion is routine, and can not be taken as evidence of notability". Let'srun (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, inclusion in what? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- "inclusion is routine, and can not be taken as evidence of notability". Let'srun (talk) 18:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I'm aware, being extensively covered on a regular basis is what makes for a notable league; that's why
- ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, if you are arguing for Keeping this article, it would be helpful if you located additional sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Local coverage is beyond routine game coverage, offering examinations of the various sports leagues under this umbrella as a whole. Here are a few examples, but as was mentioned above, there are thousands of hits in local coverage for this, many of them beyond routine game coverage.
- Also, note that there are at least two local papers covering this league.
- —siroχo 08:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.