Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Unfortunate keep. As much as I'd like to delete this, I don't think it's a good idea at the moment. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a complaint on

WP:NOTADVERTISING. Neither of the two references offered are in a language I can read, but they certainly look commercial to me. Bishonen | talk 17:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC).[reply

]

Support Deletion of
WP:ANI, per WP:THATDBEAWESOME. But I'm afraid that isn't what was intended... Zad68 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Ehm, I think that this nomination is.... mistaken? —

²¹ 17:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep per
WP:ANI is among my favourite time wasters on Wikipedia. -- cyclopia^speak! 17:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

Darn it!! I'm taking this to

WP:DELREV!!! Zad68 17:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Endorse. It is notable! -- cyclopia^speak! 17:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was this a serious suggestion to delete Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was an editor who made a mistake, and we just went silly

. -- cyclopia^speak! 10:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]