Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild Animal Baby Explorers (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Wild Animal Baby Explorers
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wild Animal Baby Explorers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still does not meet
talk) 04:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 04:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)]
- Pinging @talk) 13:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete, again. Due to the lack of participation in the first discussion, I can't quibble with the refund itself — but the article as written is not showing or WP:TVSHOW criteria for the notability of a television series, mere existence is not in and of itself enough, and the IP who requested the undeletion (a) didn't provide any actual reason why the deletion was improper, (b) didn't make any promise to improve the article in any way, and (c) got a 48-hour editblock later the same day for vandalism. Absolutely none of that is any sort of recipe for a keepworthy article. Bearcat (talk) 14:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete - No reliable sources means no article. MaxnaCarta (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.