Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Roger "Bill" Moss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Roger "Bill" Moss

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to pass

WP:GNG which appears to mostly be unlinked original research, government records such as election returns and even an Amazon.com product listing. If Moss is notable enough to merit an article, it's going to need substantially better sourcing to keep this page GPL93 (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing here is an automatic free pass over our notability standards for either politicians or music impresarios, but very few of the references represent
WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.