Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wincrest homes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wincrest homes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 declined on the basis of a non-notable industry award. Zero indication this is a notable company. No NCORP-compliant sourcing located on a search. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Australia. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails
WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment. I declined the A7. Commenters should consider the version before the article was stripped; there are claims of multiple awards for the Hunterford Estate project some of which look at least borderline significant to me. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Industry awards are as common as fleas on a dog. They don't indicate notability unless an independent source has generated coverage about the award being won. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's well past my bedtime but WL has 1,051 hits for Wincrest homes, at least some of the top few looked cogent. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Considered the
WP:CORP. Don't agree with Espresso Addict that an Award on its own can't confer notability, however I don't think the 2003 Royal Australian Institute of Architects (RAIA) Premiers Award and the National UDIA award for marketing and the Premiers award in the 2003 Australian Institute of Architects NSW annual awards, meet that bar (note, they are not sourced, so I am assuming that list is accurate). Spinifex&Sand (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Sources fail to meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. There are no in-depth articles about the company that meet the criteria. I also agree that the awards mentioned are insufficient.
HighKing⁺⁺ 16:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.