Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows 9 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted per ]
Windows 9
AfDs for this article:
This appears to be an essay, and contains much unsourced speculation and personal opinion.
talk) 15:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
]
- Delete. This is the worst Wiki article I have ever seen, since it is all personal opinion and has no sources. I was bold by blanking it and redirecting to Windows.Frmorrison (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- That was an understandable response, but see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 11#Windows 9, which deleted the previous such redirect. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Back in May there were not as many rumors as there are today about Windows 9. I can imagine some people trying to search for W9, so the redirect to Windows will show there is nothing to say about it. Frmorrison (talk) 21:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- That was an understandable response, but see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 11#Windows 9, which deleted the previous such redirect. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This is the worst Wiki article I have ever seen, since it is all personal opinion and has no sources. I was bold by blanking it and redirecting to Windows.Frmorrison (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.