Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch's kiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Witch's kiss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be nothing more than a non-notable neologism. A Google News search failed to find anything more to support it. For confirmation, I ran the topic past WikiProject Sanitation to see whether they thought it was worth salvaging, along with the similar article on Poseidon's kiss - that discussion is here and there was no support to keep the articles. Gronk Oz (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Totally not noteworthy, just some slang term, not relevant for Wikipedia.
talk) 20:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 20:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as an unnotable neologism. Of the two sources used to support the information, one of them doesn't mention the phrase at all, and the other is a "Top 15" humor article, which is hardly a reliable source. The only other places that I can find using the term is Urban Dictionary, which is not a reliable source. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agrees with above, an unnotable neologism Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable neologism. -- Dane ^talk 02:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.